Category Archives: Uncategorized

Seven Strikeouts: The New Normal

It has been widely noted that some of the trends associated with the immediate post-baseball-strike period (1995 through the early years of the 21st century) have abated over the last few seasons. Home runs and run scoring are both down from their peak, as are walks and hits.

Average home runs per team per game 2000: 1.17
Average home runs per team per game 2011: 0.94

Average runs per team per game 2000: 5.14
Average runs per team per game 2011: 4.28

Average hits per team per game 2000: 9.31
Average hits per team per game 2011: 8.70

Average walks per team per game 2000: 3.75
Average walks per team per game 2011: 3.09

But one stat that was also historically high in the heavy run-scoring period that peaked around 10 years ago has continued to climb ever higher. That’s strikeouts. More details after the jump. Continue reading

Pythagorean Estimated Wins for SPs (1893-2011)

[Another work-in-progress. Your observations are welcomed, but please review the “Known shortcomings” at the end of the post.]

Taking suggestions from readers Mike L. and kds, I used the Pythagorean method to calculate the estimated career wins for all starting pitchers with at least 1,000 innings from 1893-2011 (min. 60% of career games as a SP).

Continue reading

All-time HR leaders by team among single-franchise players (prepare to be amazed!)

I started tweeting some of this last night and realized it would make a pretty awesome post. Among players who played their entire careers for just one franchise, here are the leaders in HR for each franchise. The disparity is unbelievable.

I went with retired players only, since many current players who would appear on a single team’s leader list will ultimately change teams later and fall off the list. I tried to list at least 5 players for each team but set a cutoff at a minimum of 2 career homers.

Continue reading

Wins per WAR* for Starting Pitchers [a failed effort]

[Update: The concept of W/WAR has been shown to be fundamentally flawed; see comments by kds @11 and me @25. But I’m leaving the post open for any further comments in the threads.]

I’ve been playing around with ways to reflect the role of luck in starting pitchers’ W-L records, using data that can be pulled up with the Play Index. After muddling about with run support, defensive support and general team quality — none of which can be summoned by the Play Index — it occurred to me that those things are already factored into Wins Above Replacement (“WAR,” using the Baseball-Reference formula).

A simple ratio of Wins per WAR, then, might provide a snapshot of Wins luck for starting pitchers. The higher the ratio, the luckier the pitcher; the lower the ratio, the tougher the luck.

Continue reading

First Picks, Second Guesses

Baseball first conducted a draft of amateur players in 1965 and has done so each year ever since.  Annual drafts from 1965 through 2011 add up to 47 years of drafting to date, and thus there have been 47 number-one overall picks, from Rick Monday in 1965 to Gerrit Cole in 2011.  Baseball-Reference makes it easy to check the career Wins Above Replacement level (WAR) total for each of these 47 guys — those totals run from a high of 104.6 for Alex Rodriguez (the number one pick in 1993) to sub-zero totals for guys such as Shawn Abner (first pick of 1984) and Matt Anderson (first pick of 1997).  If you simply calculate the average career WAR produced by all 47 of these guys to date, you get a 17.0  career WAR for the average overall number-one pick.

A 17 WAR career guy is generally a guy who had a serious career as a starter in the majors, and some good years, but a guy who is unlikely to make even a “Hall of the Very Good”.  Hitters with exactly a 17.0 career WAR include Bill Melton and Steve Kemp.  Aaron Sele is an example of a 17.1 career WAR pitcher.

But you might justifiably argue that taking the average of all 47 number-one pick career WARs isn’t really a fair way to get a useful career average for number-one picks.   That’s because such an approach undervalues all the more recent picks whose major league careers are not over, and in the most recent cases have barely or not even begun.  Bryce Harper is still a teenager, but this averaging method treats his current zero career WAR to date as the equal of guys who played out their entire careers and produced zero WAR (such as Steve Chilcott, 1966).   Some of the most recent overall first picks may turn out to be busts, but surely not all of them will.  Treating them all as zeroes merely because they are still very young surely can’t be a correct method for this sort of calculation of average performance by a number one overall pick.  Also, number-one picks such as A-Rod and Chipper Jones are still adding to their career WAR totals, as are younger, more recent picks such as Justin Upton and David Price, and their potential future added WAR should be accounted for, too.

So as a more sensible test, let’s restrict our averaging to just the overall number-ones selected from 1965 through 1989.  That way we limit ourselves to only those players whose careers are fully complete (Chipper was drafted number one overall in 1990), while also giving us a sample of twenty-five selections, which is small but represents more than half the group.  What’s the average career WAR for guys who were selected number one overall if we only look at the years from 1965 through 1989?  Surprise — it’s 17.0 again!  Which reminds us that while yes, some of the recent number-one overall  picks will turn out to be great players, and many will add to their current totals (in some cases will add a large number of WAR over thier future careers), some will also turn out to be duds, and that the 17 WAR average that we get looking at all 47 guys is perhaps not as far off from a realistic average as we thought it might be.

After the jump, I take a WAR-oriented historical look at the number-one overall picks from the 1960s, and the top alternatives that were missed in those years.  And perhaps in future posts, perhaps I ‘ll carry the process further into later decades. Continue reading

The all-new baseball Stat Challenge, thanks to FanDuel.com

I’m thrilled to account a major upcoming feature on High Heat Stats: an all-new version of the immensely popular Stat Challenge I ran a couple of years ago.

I stopped the old stat challenge because the bookkeeping was too difficult. This is where FanDuel.com comes in to play–this new website is all set up for fantasy sports challenges, and each one lasts only a day. Click through for more info on how our Stat Challenge and FanDuel.com work. Continue reading

5 Year WAR Leaders – Infielders 1961-2011

Birtelcom’s recent post on dynastic succession by teams got me to thinking about succession in terms of players. In particular, does the best player at a position remain the best player for an extended period, or does that honor tend to shift around among the better players during any particular time?

To answer this question, I looked at cumulative bWAR measured over 5 year periods, for every such period since 1961. Since I was focusing on individual positions, I set a high threshold of at least 75% of games played at that position during the period. This approach will exclude players who split time among positions, or around the time of a mid-career position switch. But, I believe those are precisely the reasons why this approach is preferable when evaluating players by position.

Continue reading