The 2013 World Series champion Red Sox succeeded for a lot of reasons, including a league-leading batting average on balls in play (BABIP). Not only did Boston’s .329 BABIP lead the AL this past season, it was the highest BABIP for any team in more than 80 years, and third highest of all teams since 1916.
Undoubtedly, the Red Sox were a fine hitting team, so it shouldn’t be a great surprise that they produced a stellar BABIP. But, playing in an outstanding hitters’ ballpark shouldn’t be overlooked as a major contributor to good BABIP scores.
After the jump, more on team BABIP and the influences of home ballparks.
Here are the teams with the best BABIP results since 1916.
Rk | Year | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | sOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DET | 1921 | .331 | 887 | 1724 | 269 | 99 | 58 | 799 | 584 | 373 | .316 | .385 | .433 | .818 | 118 |
2 | STL | 1930 | .331 | 1004 | 1732 | 373 | 89 | 104 | 942 | 480 | 496 | .314 | .372 | .471 | .843 | 113 |
3 | BOS | 2013 | .329 | 853 | 1566 | 363 | 29 | 178 | 819 | 581 | 1308 | .277 | .349 | .446 | .795 | 122 |
4 | CLE | 1921 | .326 | 925 | 1656 | 355 | 90 | 42 | 846 | 624 | 380 | .308 | .384 | .431 | .815 | 117 |
5 | PHI | 1930 | .326 | 944 | 1783 | 345 | 44 | 126 | 884 | 450 | 459 | .315 | .367 | .458 | .825 | 108 |
6 | STL | 1921 | .325 | 809 | 1635 | 260 | 88 | 83 | 733 | 382 | 452 | .308 | .358 | .437 | .795 | 111 |
7 | CHC | 1930 | .325 | 998 | 1722 | 305 | 72 | 171 | 940 | 588 | 635 | .309 | .378 | .481 | .859 | 117 |
8 | MIN | 1996 | .325 | 877 | 1633 | 332 | 47 | 118 | 812 | 576 | 958 | .288 | .357 | .425 | .782 | 104 |
9 | BOS | 1997 | .325 | 851 | 1684 | 373 | 32 | 185 | 810 | 514 | 1044 | .291 | .352 | .463 | .815 | 115 |
10 | TEX | 2008 | .325 | 901 | 1619 | 376 | 35 | 194 | 867 | 595 | 1207 | .283 | .354 | .462 | .816 | 117 |
11 | PHA | 1925 | .324 | 831 | 1659 | 298 | 79 | 76 | 774 | 454 | 429 | .307 | .365 | .434 | .799 | 109 |
12 | NYY | 1927 | .324 | 975 | 1644 | 291 | 103 | 158 | 907 | 642 | 612 | .307 | .384 | .489 | .872 | 136 |
13 | PIT | 1928 | .324 | 837 | 1659 | 246 | 100 | 52 | 768 | 435 | 352 | .309 | .364 | .421 | .785 | 112 |
14 | NYY | 1930 | .324 | 1062 | 1683 | 298 | 110 | 152 | 986 | 646 | 569 | .309 | .384 | .488 | .872 | 120 |
15 | CLE | 2006 | .324 | 870 | 1576 | 351 | 27 | 196 | 839 | 556 | 1204 | .280 | .349 | .457 | .806 | 109 |
16 | WSH | 1925 | .323 | 829 | 1577 | 251 | 71 | 56 | 761 | 544 | 425 | .304 | .375 | .412 | .787 | 106 |
17 | NYG | 1930 | .323 | 959 | 1769 | 264 | 83 | 143 | 894 | 422 | 382 | .319 | .369 | .473 | .842 | 112 |
18 | CLE | 1930 | .323 | 890 | 1654 | 356 | 60 | 72 | 830 | 481 | 462 | .304 | .364 | .431 | .795 | 101 |
19 | CLE | 1999 | .323 | 1009 | 1629 | 309 | 32 | 209 | 960 | 743 | 1099 | .289 | .373 | .467 | .840 | 116 |
20 | DET | 2007 | .323 | 887 | 1652 | 352 | 50 | 177 | 857 | 474 | 1054 | .287 | .345 | .458 | .802 | 111 |
Unsurprisingly, the list is comprised entirely by teams from two high-scoring periods, 1921-30 and 1996-2013. In addition to the Red Sox, there are four other league champions represented, all of them from the first of those two periods. Not often you’ll see a list with both the 1927 Yankees and the 1930 Phillies represented, much less with the latter having the better result.
But, was the Red Sox high BABIP attributable to their ballpark, or to just being a fine hitting ball club? Looking at best home BABIP relative to overall BABIP yields the surprising result that the 2013 Red Sox failed to crack the top 300 in home BABIP edge, with their .011 home edge placing them tied for 376th place since 1916. I say that that is a surprising result because Boston appears 48 times among the 280 teams since 1916 with a home BABIP edge of .014 or better, by far the most for any team and twice as many times as the second-place Cardinals (the Rockies appear with the greatest regularity with 17 of their 21 seasons represented among those 280 teams, including 6 of the top 10, and 11 of the top 23).
Looking at specific ballparks, these have had the highest BABIP results over a minimum of 30,000 player games.
Rk | Team | Split | From | To | G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Â COL | Coors Field | 1995 | 2013 | 45012 | .330 |
2 | Â PHI | Baker Bowl | 1916 | 1938 | 38017 | .317 |
3 | Â CLE | League Park | 1916 | 1946 | 42936 | .309 |
4 | Â TEX | Rangers Ballpark | 1994 | 2013 | 33034 | .309 |
5 | Â CLE | Progressive Field | 1994 | 2013 | 32448 | .304 |
6 | Â MIN | HHH Metrodome | 1982 | 2009 | 47766 | .303 |
7 | Â FLA | Sun Life Stadium | 1993 | 2011 | 42972 | .302 |
8 | Â ARI | Chase Field | 1998 | 2013 | 37115 | .301 |
9 | Â BOS | Fenway Park | 1916 | 2013 | 171781 | .299 |
10 | Â PIT | PNC Park | 2001 | 2013 | 30282 | .299 |
11 | Â HOU | Minute Maid Park | 2000 | 2013 | 32029 | .299 |
12 | Â ATL | Turner Field | 1997 | 2013 | 39634 | .298 |
13 | Â KCR | Kauffman Stadium | 1973 | 2013 | 69080 | .297 |
14 | Â STL, SLB | Sportsmans Park | 1916 | 1966 | 152979 | .296 |
15 | Â PIT | Forbes Field | 1916 | 1970 | 100861 | .296 |
16 | Â MIL | Miller Park | 2001 | 2013 | 30343 | .295 |
17 | Â SFG | AT&T Park | 2000 | 2013 | 32481 | .294 |
18 | Â TOR | Rogers Centre | 1989 | 2013 | 40518 | .293 |
19 | Â CHC | Wrigley Field | 1916 | 2013 | 197948 | .291 |
20 | Â BAL | Camden Yards | 1992 | 2013 | 36291 | .291 |
The preponderance of current ballparks in this list might suggest they are the reason behind the coincident rise in offensive output over the past 20+ seasons. I suspect, though, that such a supposition is illusory. What is more likely the case is simply that, with more home runs and strikeouts over that period, the number of balls in play has dropped rather precipitously. That and the increased likelihood of better results (because of harder swings) when batted balls are put in play accounts for the phenomenon of current ballparks heading this list. Such a hypothesis is consistent with the following result, showing BABIP results relative to league average for different ballparks with a minimum of 30,000 player games.
Rk | Team | Split | From | To | G | BAbiptot | Diff | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | COL | Coors Field | 1995 | 2013 | 45012 | .330 | .298 | .032 |
2 | PHI | Baker Bowl | 1916 | 1938 | 38017 | .317 | .296 | .021 |
3 | CLE | League Park | 1916 | 1946 | 42936 | .309 | .292 | .017 |
4 | TEX | Rangers Ballpark | 1994 | 2013 | 33034 | .309 | .298 | .011 |
5 | BOS | Fenway Park | 1916 | 2013 | 171781 | .299 | .288 | .011 |
6 | PIT | Forbes Field | 1916 | 1970 | 100861 | .296 | .285 | .011 |
7 | MIN | HHH Metrodome | 1982 | 2009 | 47766 | .303 | .293 | .010 |
8 | STL, SLB | Sportsmans Park | 1916 | 1966 | 152979 | .296 | .286 | .010 |
9 | CLE | Progressive Field | 1994 | 2013 | 32448 | .304 | .298 | .006 |
10 | KCR | Kauffman Stadium | 1973 | 2013 | 69080 | .297 | .292 | .005 |
11 | TEX | Arlington Stadium | 1972 | 1993 | 38653 | .289 | .284 | .005 |
12 | MIN | Metropolitan Stadium | 1961 | 1981 | 40571 | .284 | .279 | .005 |
13 | FLA | Sun Life Stadium | 1993 | 2011 | 42972 | .302 | .298 | .004 |
14 | ARI | Chase Field | 1998 | 2013 | 37115 | .301 | .298 | .003 |
15 | CHC | Wrigley Field | 1916 | 2013 | 197948 | .291 | .288 | .003 |
16 | WSH, WSA | Griffith Stadium | 1916 | 1961 | 81808 | .290 | .287 | .003 |
17 | PIT | Three Rivers Stadium | 1970 | 2000 | 65021 | .290 | .287 | .003 |
18 | KCA, KCR | Municipal Stadium | 1955 | 1972 | 34933 | .279 | .276 | .003 |
19 | PIT | PNC Park | 2001 | 2013 | 30282 | .299 | .297 | .002 |
20 | PHI | Veterans Stadium | 1971 | 2003 | 71546 | .290 | .288 | .002 |
21 | STL | Busch Stadium | 1966 | 2005 | 86508 | .289 | .287 | .002 |
Adjusting for offensive context yields a greater variety of ballparks in use in different eras, though the list is admittedly still top heavy with current ballparks. While park factors undoubtedly play a role in the above results, the quality of pitching needs also to be considered. Here are the worst ballparks for ERA difference, over a minimum of 1500 games.
Rk | Split | From | To | G | ERAtot | Diff | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | COL | Coors Field | 1995 | 2013 | 24878 | 5.70 | 4.34 | 1.36 |
2 | PHI | Baker Bowl | 1916 | 1938 | 13010 | 4.73 | 3.88 | 0.85 |
3 | TEX | Rangers Ballpark | 1994 | 2013 | 23762 | 5.08 | 4.36 | 0.72 |
4 | BOS | Fenway Park | 1916 | 2013 | 78034 | 4.36 | 4.02 | 0.34 |
5 | CLE | League Park | 1916 | 1946 | 14196 | 4.26 | 3.92 | 0.34 |
6 | STL, SLB | Spostsmans Park | 1916 | 1966 | 54454 | 4.23 | 3.90 | 0.33 |
7 | SEA | Kingdome | 1977 | 1999 | 20586 | 4.40 | 4.13 | 0.27 |
8 | KCA, KCR | Municipal Stadium | 1955 | 1972 | 14276 | 3.94 | 3.67 | 0.27 |
9 | MIN | Metropolitan Stadium | 1961 | 1981 | 16630 | 3.90 | 3.65 | 0.25 |
10 | DET | Tiger Stadium | 1916 | 1999 | 61232 | 4.14 | 3.93 | 0.21 |
11 | CHW | New Comiskey Park | 1991 | 2013 | 25474 | 4.53 | 4.33 | 0.20 |
12 | MIN | HHH Metrodome | 1982 | 2009 | 28558 | 4.48 | 4.29 | 0.19 |
13 | TOR | Exhibition Stadium | 1977 | 1989 | 9982 | 4.12 | 3.94 | 0.18 |
14 | ATL | Fulton County Stadium | 1966 | 1996 | 28562 | 3.97 | 3.79 | 0.18 |
15 | BAL | Camden Yards | 1992 | 2013 | 25192 | 4.51 | 4.34 | 0.17 |
16 | TOR | Rogers Centre | 1989 | 2013 | 27146 | 4.45 | 4.30 | 0.15 |
17 | CLE | Progressive Field | 1994 | 2013 | 23138 | 4.51 | 4.36 | 0.15 |
18 | PHI | Citizens Bank Park | 2004 | 2013 | 13026 | 4.38 | 4.23 | 0.15 |
19 | ARI | Chase Field | 1998 | 2013 | 19976 | 4.47 | 4.33 | 0.14 |
20 | CIN | Great American Ballpark | 2003 | 2013 | 14486 | 4.39 | 4.25 | 0.14 |
A few new ballparks on this list, including several notable for their mainly struggling tenants and others for their tendency to promote batted balls not in play (aka home runs).
OK, here is a question and maybe it could help explain why BoSox are so consistently high. Why do we consider a ball that hits 20 feet up on the Wall “in play”. Isn’t it just as unplayable as a ball over the fence.
And the Baker Bowl had a similar Wall, if I recall correctly. Coors Field is just huge and the outfielders play up against the walls, so lots of balls fall in front of outfielders that wouldn’t happen in other places.
The Baker Bowl did indeed have a high wall, in right field, higher even than the 37-foot green monster. Initially 40 feet high, a 20 foot screen was added in 1915, so the numbers here reflect play with a 60 foot-high structure in right that measured between 270 and 280 feet from home plate.
Why are unplayable balls considered in play. Good question for which there isn’t a good answer. One could reasonably make a case that such balls are less in play than home runs, some of which fielders have a chance of making a play on.
I would agree with your surmise that high BABIP in Fenway and the Baker Bowl are attributable to those unplayable in-play balls. League Park also but for a different reason. There was no high wall in its 290 foot right field porch but that distance was reduced to 240 feet when roped off for overflow crowds (League Park seated only 21,000). Not sure what the ground rule may have been but it wouldn’t be unreasonable to suppose that balls hit into the roped-off section (but not over the fence) would be counted as a ground-rule single or double.
Don’t forget about the Baggie in right field at the Metrodome.
The extensive ground rules at the metrodome will terrify even the most anal of baseball minds. Seriously, take a look if you want a headache.
And fielders losing routine fly balls looking up at the white fabric roof.
You say, “The preponderance of current ballparks in this list might suggest they are the reason behind the coincident rise in offensive output over the past 20+ seasons.”
Are you refuting in total the idea that the current crop of parks influenced by the opening of Coca-Cola Field in Buffalo contribute to the scoring era of the 90s and 00s? Or did you just expect a reader to assign undue credit to the parks, hence the following table and paragraph?
The latter, fireworks.
Certainly, ballpark characteristics are an influence (as discussed in the comments above). But, the replacement of ball-in-play outs with strikeouts, and the increase in home runs also have had a strong influence on BABIP by driving down balls in play.
I hadn’t slept yet. I got fixated on that statement for some reason. I knew it was a stupid question but I had to post it.
How exactly did you call up this list? At Play Index, did you go to Split Finders/Team Batting?
When I click on “View Play Index Tool Used” one thing it shows in the choices is
“Find Individual Seasons (highest number of home runs hit/allowed by a left-handed batter against a left-handed pitcher in a season)”
It seems like the link should be to something that has to do with teams, not individuals
Thanks for asking, Cyril.
The link is generated by Baseball-Reference. And, yes, it doesn’t really take you to the query for the displayed report.
You can register your complaint/suggestion on the B-R site.
I think you need to send people to “Split Finders/Team Batting”
When it asks for “Team or League” it is not clear that to call up the best team/seasons in some stat you should just leave it alone
Here’s what I did for the first list.
Team Batting Split Finder
Find Individual Seasons
Split Tyoe: Total
Choose a Split: Total
Sort by BAbip
Get Report
Thanks. But what if say you want to call up all the teams that had 125 or more HRs at home? When I did what you describe above, it also gives me all the league seasons that were at least 125 HRs at home. And there is alot of those. Is there some way to avoid that and just get the first team? Which I think is some year in the 2000s by the Rangers?
For the second list:
Team Batting Split Finder
Find Totals Spanning Seasons
Team or League: MLB Teams Together
Split Type: Ballparks
Choose a Split: Match any listed
Sort by BAbip
Choose a Stat: G equal to or greater than 30000
Get Report
Doug’s list has the name of the ballpark but my list has the BR symbol.
I pay a visit everyday a few blogs and websites to read posts,
except this webpage offers quality based posts.