Angels 14, Red Sox 13 – a game for our times

Thursday’s wild and woolly game at Fenway caught my attention for any number of reasons. Of course, it was an extreme game, but interesting for how it illustrates a lot of the traits and trends that mark baseball of the present day.

I’ll let you absorb the line score, then talk a bit more about the game (or even go on a bit of a rant) after the jump.

                1  2  3   4  5  6   7  8  9  10    R H E
                -  -  -   -  -  -   -  -  -   -    -  - -
Angels          0  0  8   0  0  0   1  0  3   2 ..14 20 1
Red Sox         1  5  0   0  1  2   0  2  1   1 ..13 18 2

First off, the score. This was the 118th time in the game-searchable era that both teams have scored 13 or more runs. The Red Sox have been involved 11 times, and the Angels 4 times. This was the 7th time in the past 5 years with such a game, about on par with the preceding 5 years, but down from a recent peak around the turn of this century with 12 such games from 1998 to 2002. Unsurprisingly, almost 30% of these 118 games occurred in just a 10-year period from 1928 to 1937.

The pitchers. There were 15 pitchers used in the game, the 220th time that many or more have been used, but the 90th time this has happened in the past 5 years. Prior to 1990, there had been only 15 such games, the earliest in 1954. Of the 15 pitchers, 4 recorded a blown save (the most pitchers in a game with a blown save is 5, occurring only in 1996 and 2000). It was just the 31st time that 4 pitchers in a game have blown a save, but the 8th time in the past 5 years.

The substitutes. Excluding the pitchers, there was only one substitution made in the game. So far this season, 6310 non-pitchers have appeared as substitutes in league games, about 3.5 per game. That total is on pace for for the lowest mark since the 1940s, and down about 23% since 2000. In this particular game, leads were lost or gained 6 times from the 6th inning on and runs were scored in each of the last 5 half-innings. Yet, the only substitution made was a pinch-hitting move with two outs and nobody on base in the 7th inning.

The managers (and being too smart by half). As mentioned, this game featured 15 pitchers of whom 4 recorded blown saves. Of the 13 substitute pitchers, only 6 retired the first batter faced, and only 4 retired more batters than they allowed to reach base. The two closers each blew a save in the 9th inning while allowing a HR and each stayed in the game to finish that inning and start the next. All signs that maybe freely substituting pitchers in and out of the game is, if nothing else, a risky proposition. After all, you never know what you’re going to get on any given day. Nevertheless, managerial strategy seems hidebound to the notion that every pitcher has his role and once he’s fulfilled that role (if he does), it’s on to the next arm. Even if the guy currently on the mound happens to look pretty sharp. Exception, of course, is the designated closer, who is always given enough rope (or more) to hang himself (and the team) if he’s not “on” that particular day.

The last two points, of course, are inter-related. The more specialized pitchers’ roles become, the larger the pitching staffs, the smaller the benches, and the fewer are the opportunities for in-game tactical substitutions. The days are gone of having a player (or even two) on the roster whose principal role was pinch-hitting.

Finally, the time of the game. This contest finished in a shade over four and a half hours. I know fans love offense, but I think they also cringe seeing one pitcher after another struggle to be effective. Bottom line for me, the pace of play is way too slow. This was the fifth 4 hour game at Fenway this season, and the 46th (69%) over 3 hours. In 1992 it was 3 games over 4 hours and 44 (54%) over 3 hours. In 1972, 1 game over 4 hours and 6 (yes, six!) over 3 hours. You get the idea. Obviously, pitching changes are part of the reason. But, the notion that a pitcher needs to take 20 to 30 seconds to prepare himself to deliver a pitch (or even to throw over to first) needs to change. Ditto for batters needing to step out of the box and adjust various articles of their paraphernalia after every pitch.

Well, enough ranting on my part. What’s your take?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DaveKingman
DaveKingman
11 years ago

Nice post. Especially about the times. I was watching Game 7 of the Twins-Dodgers World Series a while back on ESPN Classic. Koufax was on the mound. http://www.baseball-reference.com/postseason/1965_WS.shtml I honestly thought the game was on some sort of deliberate high-speed, fast-forward thing. Koufax to Roseboro. Back to the mound, the wind-up and the pitch. Back to the mound, the wind-up and the pitch. It doesn’t have the time listed on BBref, but it had to be under 2 hours. What a pleasure to watch. It was almost like watching a football or basketball game. The length of the games today… Read more »

Steven
Steven
11 years ago
Reply to  DaveKingman

I admit I got spoiled as a kid by seeing Bob Gibson (the king of the 2:00 hour complete game)pitch. I just looked up a game I went to at Busch Stadium on August 11, 1970. Cardinals beat the Padres, 11-10, in two hours and forty-four minutes. Too many delays now. Not enough time anymore to sit through an entire game. TV highlights is about it for me anymore. Another poster mentioned the graphics on the television screen. I can live without those, too. Another thing: If I’m watching a game on ESPN Classic from forty or fifty years ago,… Read more »

brp
brp
11 years ago
Reply to  DaveKingman

Actually, they’ve done research and shown that there’s more action in a baseball game than a football game (and they both take ~3 hours on average). Granted a lot of the action in a baseball game is only pitcher-batter-catcher, but still. The NFL does an excellent job of integrating replay and, for all the guff we give to announcers and rightly so, keeping people involved in the game one way or another. It’s also the nature of the sport that 22 people are involved in every play instead of 3, but it’s somewhat a fallacy to say there’s more action… Read more »

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
11 years ago

I agree that today’s managers don’t always do a good job with their bullpens. Was Valentine correct in removing Morales after Ciriaco made an error on what should have been an inning ending grounder in the 3rd? If Ciriaco makes the play the score is 6-2 Boston and the inning is over. But errors are a part of the game — we all know that. The problem is, “most” relievers don’t do well when they come in with the bases loaded, and in this case, the move backfired when Mortensen came in a yielded a walk followed by 3 consecutive… Read more »

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
11 years ago
Reply to  Brooklyn Mick

In last night’s loss Valentine kept Tazawa in for 37 pitches after removing him after only 13 two nights ago. Of course, the difference is that on Thursday he went in to finish the 3rd and then retire the side in order in the 4th, and last night he was used in the late frames, getting a 1-2-3 inning in the 11th, and then going back out for the 12th and retiring the first two batters before issuing a walk and allowing a double and a run scoring single. Obviously the absence of Alfredo Aceves, who has a 3-day timeout… Read more »

DaveR
DaveR
11 years ago

I can barely watch games anymore. I don’t know how a pitcher can possibly be effective when he’s just fidgeting and stepping off all the time. Sometimes it’s just excruciating to see this. I find myself just watching highlights on MLB Network most of the time.
I agree with just about everything you’re saying here, Doug.

bstar
11 years ago

Great post, Doug. It seems the specialization of relief pitchers is here to stay, at least for awhile until something changes. One of the biggest advantages this gives a team is they don’t have to pay much for relievers. Closers getting big contracts are the exception and not the rule, and set-up guys are even cheaper. From a financial standpoint, I don’t see teams moving away from this construct. As for the pace of games, is there one person in America who prefers a 4 1/2 hour game to a 2 hr 45 min one? There can’t be. It’s completely… Read more »

Andy R
Andy R
11 years ago

Possibly the polar opposite of this game was one that I attended in 1974- Braves at Giants, September 1974, a Monday afternoon game at Candlestick Park. Jim Barr pitched a complete game, winning 4-2, that took 1:38 to play. I think it was a 12:15 start, so the game was over by 2pm. Oh, and the attendance was 748- when we arrived, we were the only two people at the ticket windows- turned out later that the walk-up was 48 people. It was as if the game never happened. I hardly ever watch TV games anymore, as it drags so… Read more »

Cameron
Cameron
11 years ago

I was at the game, and at the time it seemed completely necessary to take Morales out. Brooklyn Mick is right about Ciriaco’s error, but by that point Morales had lost all control of the situation. His command was gone, he just couldn’t throw a strike. Looking back, it’s easy to say that Mortenson shouldn’t have been brought in, but Valentine needed to do something. And everyone is completely right about the time of the game, because it wasn’t just a result of the offense. The pitchers were working incredibly slowly, and the game was dragging on by the 3rd… Read more »

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
11 years ago

What’s the matter with you, Doug? Slow games allow the home team to market more beer and sushi, and fans have a chance to listen to rock at full volume without earphones. Strangers become friends as they discuss which relief pitchers they missed seeing because they ran to the rest room, and they can exchange contact information while the current pitcher awaits divine assurances about his next pitch. Commercials multiply, stimulating the economy as the value of TV contracts grows, and commentators have so many additional opportunities to display shrewd intelligence through sophisticated analyses and witty banter, providing the viewing… Read more »

Nash Bruce
Nash Bruce
11 years ago

Beer and sushi do not go together. Sorry.

Hartvig
Hartvig
11 years ago
Reply to  Nash Bruce

There should be a law…

no statistician but
no statistician but
11 years ago

I may be alone in this—not an unusual thing for me at HHS—but what drove me away from watching live sports on TV, apart from the commercials, was instant replay. When it was a novelty, back in the 1960s, its limited use had a purpose, to highlight exceptional plays. I could handle that. About twenty years ago, though, I suddenly couldn’t take it any longer—every pitch shown over and over from three camera angles, sometimes cutting into the live action, every juke and launch to the basket in quadruplicate, every sacked QB hammered multiple times between plays. I may be… Read more »

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
11 years ago

Is Adrian Gonzales THAT good?
The Dodgers took the horrific Crawford contract because they wanted Adrian that much?
Ben Cherington has got to have that deep, earthy, satisfying feeling that you get after a massive bowel movement.

As a Yankees and Giants fan I am thoroughly confused and conflicted by all this.
But, bizarro as this feels, I think I came to like the Red Sox today.

Mike L
Mike L
11 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

I cannot see what motivated the Dodgers to make this trade. They gave up prospects, and then assumed contracts that are far more than the market would have paid for these players. There’s a real possibility that neither Crawford nor Beckett will ever again be top tier players. Red Sox front office should be thrilled.

John Autin
Editor
11 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

I love the smell of panic in Los Angeles….

Here’s hoping their postseason hopes are snuffed out in that final series with SF.

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

In Crawford’s two seasons with Boston he totaled 161 games. .292 OBP 23 steals 0.3 WAR His primary tool is speed. He is 30 years old. He is owed 101 million dollars. He is coming off of two major surgeries. The Dodgers just gave 42 million to a Cuban outfielder named Yasiel Puig. They have a Gold Glover (Victorino) as good as Crawford who will be a free agent, but who will Not get 20 million a year. The Dodgers have not won the World Series in 24 years. The Mayan apocalips thing is in 117 days. It is 3:30… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

John A, in the yin and yang of the world, that which is bad for the Dodgers must, by definition, be good for the Red Sox. It feels a little like those old horror movies, where you think the monster has finally been vanquished, and, instead the closing shot is a claw emerging from the ooze….
I better go running to clear my head. This can’t be good.

Jim Bouldin
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Methinks I sense the anti-MSU sentiment coming out of a Wolverine…

🙂

Jim Bouldin
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Methinks I sense the anti-MSU sentiment coming out of a Wolverine…

🙂

But truth be told, I’m pulling for the Giants as well. And the A’s for that matter.

John Autin
Editor
11 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

Jim, my remarks were not aimed against Magic Johnson as a Spartan, or really against him at all. I like Magic.

I just hate the idea that a team can pick up a player like Adrian Gonzalez in late August. And I’m a little disturbed by the possibility of the Dodgers becoming Yankees West.

RetroRob
RetroRob
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

For the moment at least, looks more like they might become the Red Sox West!

Jim Bouldin
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I know John, just giving you a hard time.

Luis Gomez
Luis Gomez
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Adrian Gonzalez becoming a Dodger was one of my biggest fears when the Padres put him in the trading block. When thay traded him to Boston, I somehow became a Red Sox follower, if not a fan. But know… well, I have to come up with a new favorite player.

Paul E
Paul E
11 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

John: I have to believe that most baseball fans were surprised by the Dodgers’ excellent start. If their front office and ownership “knew” baseball, they had to feel pretty fortunate as well. One thing they do know: they have money, lots of money. They have chosen to take the Kenny Williams-Tony Reagins approach to player development by basically taking on shitty contracts in the hope a change of scenery will be the fountain of youth for guys like Hanley, Crawford, and Beckett or in the case of the other two GM’s, Alex Rios and Vernon Wells. Not exactly sensible, but… Read more »

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
11 years ago
Reply to  Paul E

Booby The Brain also said the following (which may or may not be relevant to this thread):

“If you’re poor and you do something stupid, you’re nuts. If you’re rich and do something stupid, you’re eccentric.”

“North Dakota State. What do you have to do there to graduate? Milk a cow with your left hand?”

“He’s the only man who can hide his own Easter eggs.”

Andy R
Andy R
11 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

Voomo, I’ve always wondered if Allan H. Selig Jr. is a nine-to-five humanoid lifer or just a ham-and-egger. Bobby Heenan has always been able to put the right perspective on things and people…

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
11 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

Well Doug, if copy and pasting Bobby Heenan quotes is all you’ve got to do to be funny, then you’re right, I’m hilarious.

But thank you, I’ll take the compliment.
And yes, I have deliberately been a comedian in a professional context at times, though usually I’m just that everyday sarcastic asshole that people can handle in small doses.

But I’m publishing a book next week.
(Not that I would use this forum to sell things, but… you wanna buy it?)

tag
tag
11 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

To the Dodgers as a baseball team Gonzalez obviously is not THAT good. To the Dodgers as a conglomerate with a gazillion-dollar television deal and relentless marketing and merchandising arms, he, as Mexican-born star from Southern California, may be, I can’t really judge. Magic may feel he has to counter the Angels’ Pujols signing of a marquee Hispanic 1B with one of his own. That’s what has gotten dispiriting about baseball, as epm rightly notes – the fact that it has become as much a marketing as a sporting event. And an overly long and too often boring event at… Read more »

Larry
Larry
11 years ago

Back in the 70’s to early 80’s I went to a dozen games or so each season at the Astrodome. I kept score in a Peterson scoring notebook that had boxes to keep track of the count. Once there were 20 pitches in the half inning, it was very unusual for the defense to escape without giving up a run. So then I grew up and got a life and hardly ever went to games anymore and definitely quit keeping score when I did. Thirty to forty years have lapsed and pitch counts are kept religiously. Hell, the Nats are… Read more »

Larry
Larry
11 years ago

@DaveKingman

Game 7 of the 1965 WS lasted 2:27

Steven
Steven
11 years ago
Reply to  Larry

In 1966, the final three games of the Series lasted 2:26, 1:55 and 1:45. The fact that the combined scores of those games was 8-0 had a little bit to do with that. Three complete games by the Orioles. Baltimore reliever, Eddie Fisher, who was not used in the Series, referred to his winning World Series share as “the biggest unemployment check in history.”

Larry
Larry
11 years ago

How glad the Dodgers must be that they didn’t get saddled with Carlos Lee. How the rich get richer – the Astros dumped their salary hogs and it seemed like they ended up with 90% of the salary. The Red Sox got the Dodgers to pick up the lion’s share. What is LA’s payroll now – probably at least $200 million.

Larry
Larry
11 years ago

You’ve got to wonder if the Dodgers would have pulled the trigger on this if Melky didn’t get suspended. Gonzalez alone could get them over the hump. All they needed was the bucks to take on the deadweight of Crawford and Beckett. Are the Dodgers in luxury tax zone yet?

Jim Bouldin
11 years ago

I think this post and thread qualifies as one of the more entertaining since I’ve been reading here, which admittedly has not been that long. And I agree with pretty much everything that’s been said. I’m pretty sure the broadcast right owners and advertisers are pretty happy with the “new reliever every other batter” approach late in games when fans are invested in the outcome of close games. Especially during the playoffs. On the other hand if you get a couple of really informative announcers who do their homework, they can add a lot of interesting info to the broadcast.… Read more »

Insert Name Here
Insert Name Here
11 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

I agree as well. It’s all about money, especially through broadcasting rights and advertisements. Radio announcers are so much more informative, as well.

Nash Bruce
Nash Bruce
11 years ago

Yup.
(not the most educated reply, but…you said it!)

Jim Bouldin
11 years ago

Oh, and as long as we’re ranting, let’s add a 5th playoff team that can potentially bounce out a legitimately good wildcard team (that say has the misfortune of being in the AL East), in a single game series. That will certainly help increase the chances that the best teams advance to the WS…

Insert Name Here
Insert Name Here
11 years ago

I’m a Red Sox fan, but I’ve found that Sox games are unbearable to watch unless you’re in the ballpark… earlier this year it was determined that the 5 Red Sox starters at the time (probably Lester, Beckett, Bard, Doubront, and Buchholz) were all in the top 7 for longest amount of time spent between pitches. And that was without Daisuke Matsuzaka. And while we’re all ranting, Dice-K is back off the DL and starting tomorrow. I have tickets to this game… it’s almost like I’m cursed to always be stuck with one of his starts when I get tickets.… Read more »

Insert Name Here
Insert Name Here
11 years ago
Reply to  Doug

Yeah… oddly similar situation, huh? Trade the big name, big money star(s) to the Dodgers, get a has-been star in return (of course, Loney comes with prospects, Bay didn’t). However, Bay was brought back by the Sox for 2009 and continued to succeed, before floundering with the Mets. I sometimes wonder that if he didn’t leave Boston, he would have continued to play well – in other words, that he struggled and has had injury problems with the Mets as a consequence of leaving the Red Sox for the Mets (the exact same thing happened to Pedro). Okay, so the… Read more »

Larry
Larry
11 years ago

A couple of points: The Dodgers are negotiating broadcasting rights. The star players they signed will up the ante on that. They are talking 8 to 9 BILLION over the term of the contract. Secondly, the luxury tax kicks in at a payroll of $178 million. I wonder how many teams will have their payrolls less than the amount the Dodgers go over the luxury tax.

Doug
Doug
11 years ago

Royals 10, Red Sox 9.

Wow. Two four and a half hour games in 3 days. On a dollar per minute of “play” basis, Red Sox fans sure get their money’s worth.

Wonder when Boston last lost two games in three days that they had led by 6 runs. At home, no less.

Hartvig
Hartvig
11 years ago

The one big positive about this game is that now the Angels have to face my Tigers with their bullpen depleted. Otherwise, your post is spot on.