Two years ago, Andy did a series on choosing the top 4 players representing each major league franchise. Andy finished the American League teams and had started with some of the National League expansion franchises. Those posts and the voting results can be found here.
Since we’ve now begun a long off-season, I thought it might be fun to finish that series by running through the original NL franchises.
To start, readers are asked to choose the 4 players that best represent the Philadelphia Phillies. No rules other than that. Have fun!
This franchise started as the Philadelphia Quakers in 1883 and has operated in the National League continuously since then. In 1890 the Quakers became the Phillies, a nickname that has remained with the team since, save for the 1943 and 1944 seasons when the team was known as the Blue Jays.
For most of its existence, the Phillies have been a second division club, often failing to reach .500 much less contend. Their first pennant came in 1915, followed by second place finishes the next two years. Then 31 straight seasons finishing no higher than 4th and with only one season above .500 (and that only barely, with a 78-76 record in 1932).
A third place finish in 1949 and a second pennant in 1950 portended better things ahead but the revival was short-lived. They weren’t as bad as in the ’20s and ’30s, but the ’50s and ’60s Phillies were again consigned to the second division with only one finish higher than 4th in the twenty years from 1954 to 1973. That one season, in 1964, was notable for a famous collapse in the final two weeks of the season that saw the Phillies lose 10 straight, surrendering a 6.5 game lead in only a week (Sep 20-27).
Philadelphia’s first sustained stretch as a contending club came from 1975 to 1984 with 10 straight .500 seasons, only once finishing lower than 3rd. Included were 6 post-season appearances, two pennants and a first world championship in 1980. Back in decline after that, the Phillies had just one .500 season from 1987 to 2000 but they made it count with a fifth NL pennant in 1993. More recently, Philadelphia posted 11 of 12 .500 finishes from 2001 to 2012, never finishing lower than 3rd and climaxing with 5 straight post-season appearances from 2007 to 2011, including two more pennants and a second world championship in 2008.
Here are the top 15 Phillies batters, by career WAR:
Rk | Player | WAR | From | To | Age | G | PA | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | Pos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mike Schmidt | 106.5 | 1972 | 1989 | 22-39 | 2404 | 10062 | 1506 | 2234 | 408 | 59 | 548 | 1595 | 1507 | 1883 | .267 | .380 | .527 | .908 | *53/H64 |
2 | Chase Utley | 61.5 | 2003 | 2014 | 24-35 | 1478 | 6335 | 926 | 1569 | 334 | 48 | 228 | 886 | 603 | 923 | .285 | .370 | .488 | .858 | *4/H3D |
3 | Ed Delahanty | 60.9 | 1888 | 1901 | 20-33 | 1557 | 7141 | 1368 | 2214 | 442 | 158 | 87 | 1288 | 643 | 384 | .348 | .414 | .508 | .922 | *7384/695 |
4 | Richie Ashburn | 57.2 | 1948 | 1959 | 21-32 | 1794 | 8223 | 1114 | 2217 | 287 | 97 | 22 | 499 | 946 | 455 | .311 | .394 | .388 | .782 | *8/7H9 |
5 | Sherry Magee | 47.8 | 1904 | 1914 | 19-29 | 1521 | 6312 | 898 | 1647 | 337 | 127 | 75 | 886 | 546 | 466 | .299 | .371 | .447 | .818 | *7/93684 |
6 | Bobby Abreu | 47.0 | 1998 | 2006 | 24-32 | 1353 | 5885 | 891 | 1474 | 348 | 42 | 195 | 814 | 947 | 1078 | .303 | .416 | .513 | .928 | *9/H8D |
7 | Jimmy Rollins | 45.7 | 2000 | 2014 | 21-35 | 2090 | 9511 | 1325 | 2306 | 479 | 111 | 216 | 887 | 753 | 1145 | .267 | .327 | .424 | .751 | *6/HD4 |
8 | Johnny Callison | 39.4 | 1960 | 1969 | 21-30 | 1432 | 5930 | 774 | 1438 | 265 | 84 | 185 | 666 | 513 | 854 | .271 | .338 | .457 | .795 | *97/H8 |
9 | Roy Thomas | 36.5 | 1899 | 1911 | 25-37 | 1286 | 5788 | 923 | 1364 | 80 | 42 | 6 | 264 | 946 | 454 | .295 | .421 | .334 | .755 | *8/391 |
10 | Billy Hamilton | 36.4 | 1890 | 1895 | 24-29 | 732 | 3629 | 880 | 1084 | 126 | 51 | 23 | 370 | 553 | 150 | .360 | .468 | .459 | .927 | *78 |
11 | Dick Allen | 35.4 | 1963 | 1976 | 21-34 | 1070 | 4511 | 697 | 1143 | 204 | 64 | 204 | 655 | 517 | 1023 | .290 | .371 | .530 | .902 | *537/H684 |
12 | Chuck Klein | 34.9 | 1928 | 1944 | 23-39 | 1405 | 5772 | 963 | 1705 | 336 | 64 | 243 | 983 | 471 | 410 | .326 | .382 | .553 | .935 | *97H/83 |
13 | Del Ennis | 33.8 | 1946 | 1956 | 21-31 | 1630 | 6939 | 891 | 1812 | 310 | 65 | 259 | 1124 | 539 | 622 | .286 | .344 | .479 | .823 | *79/H83 |
14 | Gavvy Cravath | 30.9 | 1912 | 1920 | 31-39 | 1104 | 4238 | 525 | 1054 | 222 | 72 | 117 | 676 | 503 | 514 | .291 | .381 | .489 | .871 | *9/H78 |
15 | Sam Thompson | 30.8 | 1889 | 1898 | 29-38 | 1034 | 4835 | 930 | 1478 | 275 | 107 | 95 | 963 | 344 | 147 | .334 | .388 | .509 | .897 | *9/783 |
And the top 15 pitchers, by career WAR:
Rk | Player | WAR | From | To | Age | G | GS | CG | SHO | W | L | IP | BB | SO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Robin Roberts | 69.7 | 1948 | 1961 | 21-34 | 529 | 472 | 272 | 35 | 234 | 199 | .540 | 3739.1 | 718 | 1871 | 3.46 | 3.49 | 114 |
2 | Steve Carlton | 64.6 | 1972 | 1986 | 27-41 | 499 | 499 | 185 | 39 | 241 | 161 | .600 | 3697.1 | 1252 | 3031 | 3.09 | 3.05 | 120 |
3 | Pete Alexander | 60.3 | 1911 | 1930 | 24-43 | 338 | 280 | 219 | 61 | 190 | 91 | .676 | 2513.2 | 561 | 1409 | 2.18 | 2.39 | 140 |
4 | Cole Hamels | 40.4 | 2006 | 2014 | 22-30 | 275 | 274 | 13 | 6 | 108 | 83 | .565 | 1801.1 | 453 | 1707 | 3.27 | 3.48 | 125 |
5 | Curt Schilling | 36.8 | 1992 | 2000 | 25-33 | 242 | 226 | 61 | 14 | 101 | 78 | .564 | 1659.1 | 415 | 1554 | 3.35 | 3.27 | 126 |
6 | Chris Short | 32.2 | 1959 | 1972 | 21-34 | 459 | 301 | 88 | 24 | 132 | 127 | .510 | 2253.0 | 762 | 1585 | 3.38 | 3.24 | 105 |
7 | Jim Bunning | 31.4 | 1964 | 1971 | 32-39 | 226 | 208 | 65 | 23 | 89 | 73 | .549 | 1520.2 | 329 | 1197 | 2.93 | 2.80 | 122 |
8 | Charlie Buffinton | 27.3 | 1887 | 1889 | 26-28 | 133 | 127 | 115 | 9 | 77 | 50 | .606 | 1112.2 | 272 | 512 | 2.89 | 3.16 | 131 |
9 | Charlie Ferguson | 25.5 | 1884 | 1887 | 21-24 | 183 | 170 | 165 | 13 | 99 | 64 | .607 | 1514.2 | 290 | 728 | 2.67 | 3.12 | 120 |
10 | Curt Simmons | 24.4 | 1947 | 1960 | 18-31 | 325 | 263 | 109 | 18 | 115 | 110 | .511 | 1939.2 | 718 | 1052 | 3.66 | 3.45 | 108 |
11 | Tully Sparks | 24.0 | 1897 | 1910 | 22-35 | 224 | 198 | 150 | 18 | 95 | 95 | .500 | 1698.0 | 374 | 586 | 2.48 | 2.60 | 109 |
12 | Al Orth | 23.4 | 1895 | 1901 | 22-28 | 193 | 173 | 149 | 14 | 100 | 72 | .581 | 1504.2 | 314 | 359 | 3.49 | 3.55 | 109 |
13 | Cliff Lee | 22.3 | 2009 | 2014 | 30-35 | 118 | 118 | 12 | 8 | 48 | 34 | .585 | 827.1 | 124 | 813 | 2.94 | 2.85 | 132 |
14 | Dan Casey | 21.9 | 1886 | 1889 | 23-26 | 142 | 142 | 128 | 11 | 72 | 59 | .550 | 1197.2 | 339 | 485 | 2.91 | 3.50 | 124 |
15 | Kid Gleason | 18.7 | 1888 | 1891 | 21-24 | 166 | 143 | 132 | 7 | 78 | 70 | .527 | 1328.2 | 482 | 475 | 3.39 | 3.61 | 105 |
Please choose 4 players, or write in your own. Polls are open until midnight Pacific time on Tue, Nov 18th. You can check on results using the link at the bottom of the ballot.
First to comment—that’s a first, if I hurry.
Can’t do without Schmidt and Roberts, it seems to me. Carlton, too. The other big names, except Ashburn, made as much a mark elsewhere as in Philly. Have to go with the presidential candidate, I think. Three pitchers out of four?
Schmidt and Carlton, obviously, probably Robin Roberts too. In an odd sort of way, Ryan Howard came to mind next, for reasons both good and bad.
Oh happy day- Mount Rushmore is back. I’ve wondered more than a time or two since we last voted when or even if this was going to happen.
I’m not ready to cast my vote just yet. I generally prefer to have a representative sample of players from across the franchises entire timeline but since almost all of their success is centered around a couple of eras (late 70’s/early 80’s and the 00’s) but a few brief blips on the radar in the many years outside of that this is going to be a tough one.
I’m mean how do you not have Roberts or Ashburn up there and yet during their tenure there together with the exception of 1950 they only once finished within 10 games of first and that was still only good for a 4th place finish. Do you really put Chase Utley in ahead of Old Pete?
And how do you not vote for Roy Thomas, one of the most statistically unique players ever?
Decisions, decisions.
A welcome diversion, Doug! But this was a LOT tougher than it might have been, for the losing-est team in MLB history. I went Schmitty & Lefty, Utley and Ol’ Pete. I felt dirty leaving out Robin Roberts, one of the best 5-year peaks in the live-ball era. (Maybe he can get a “Crazy Horse” monument later on.)
I went with Schmidt, Carlton, Utley, and Robin Roberts. Alexander only playing seven seasons for Philly was why I left him off. Richie Ashburn was a tougher omission. Utley was my final choice because I don’t think he’s done accumulating WAR.
Schmidt and Carlton are gimmes. The other 2 were tougher. Then realized Robert & Klein both won Triple Crowns for lousy teams. There’s my 4.
Hey, I didn’t quite get this: who was the Robert you referenced here that won the Triple Crown?
That is a puzzler.
The only other Phillie to win a TC was named Pete.
He won three in a row, but not for lousy teams.
Perhaps he erroneously thought that Robin Roberts won the pitching TC.
Ya got me. I erroneously thought Robin Roberts did. He’d’ve won 300 games if he’d pitched for better teams.
Well, I voted for Roberts in any case, as well as Schmidt and Carlton (can’t believe anybody would not vote for Lefty!), plus Pete Alexander. 3 pitchers–wasn’t expecting that.
Seven World Series homers for Utley. Only Duke Snider has more for one team other than the Yankees. Frank Robinson had seven for the O’s, Goose Goslin seven for the Senators, and Utley — that’s it in terms of topping six for one team. Overall, an 1.183 WS OPS. With everything else he’s accomplished, and given Phillies history, that’s enough for me to chisel his face on the mountain.
Schmidt and Carlton are easy…….
My third choice was Delahanty………
My fourth choice was………..in all honesty?………..”The Phillie Phanatic”.
Think I am crazy? Here, according to wikipedia, are all the non-baseball credits the Phanatic has received…….
In popular culture
The Phillie Phanatic with fans at Veterans Stadium at a Camera Day pre-game event in 1987.
The Phillie Phanatic in the stands of Veterans Stadium on Opening Day, 1986.
The Phanatic appeared in the closing credits of the film Rocky Balboa (2006).
The Phanatic appeared on the episode of the television show Jon and Kate Plus 8 titled “Baseball Game with Daddy”, where Jon took Cara and all 3 boys to a Phillies game.
The Phanatic’s head disappeared during the Phillies’ “Final Pieces” charity sale and auction in 2004. Tom Burgoyne had taken off the costume for a break and found the head missing when he returned. One week later, someone anonymously called a local radio station claiming that he found the head and would bring it to the radio station. Police arrested and charged Bernard Bechtel with felony theft after he brought the $3,000 head to the station.[15]
In March 2009, the Phanatic appeared on The Simpsons in the episode Gone Maggie Gone, greeting a party of nuns disembarking from a ship at the future site of Philadelphia. In the Simpsons episode Dancin’ Homer, there is a mascot that looks similar to the Phanatic, the Capital City Goofball.
In November 2009, the Phanatic was part of a bit on the Late Show with David Letterman called “Get to Know the Phillie Phanatic.”[16]
In 2010, the Phanatic appeared in the This is SportsCenter series of advertisements with Derek Jeter of the New York Yankees.[17]
The Phanatic was mimicked in an episode of “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” called “The World Series Defense.” In the episode, Charlie’s “Green Man” challenges that the “Phrenetic” (as it is referred to in the episode) should not be the only mascot for the Phillies. He is promptly put in his place by the “Phrenetic.” In an interview with Angelo Cataldi, Tom Burgoyne revealed that Major League Baseball declined to allow the Phanatic to be used in the episode. Charlie references this at the conclusion of the episode, attempting to file a countersuit against Major League Baseball due to the fact that he has to call the mascot the “Phrenetic” when he knows its name is the “Phanatic”.
On January 26, 2012, the Phanatic (credited to Tom Burgoyne) appeared as itself on an episode of the NBC sitcom 30 Rock called “The Ballad of Kenneth Parcell”.
Honors
The Phanatic was voted “best mascot ever” by Sports Illustrated for Kids.[18] In January 2008, Forbes magazine named the Phanatic the best mascot in sports.[19]
In 2005, David Raymond founded the Mascot Hall of Fame, and the Phanatic was inducted as a charter member. Since 2003, Burgoyne has written several children’s books, published by the team, featuring the Phanatic.[20]
In 2009, the Phanatic was one of several recipients of the Great Friend to Kids (GFTK) Awards, given by the Please Touch Museum (the Children’s Museum of Philadelphia).[21]
The Phillie Phanatic, along with Youppi! and the San Diego Chicken, are the only mascots on display in the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown, New York.
In 2010, an assortment of 5 feet (1.5 m) tall, 100 pounds (45 kg) fiberglass statues were painted by artists and placed on display throughout Philadelphia from April through August with all monies raised going to Phillies’ Charities.[22]
The Phillie Phanatic was created in 1978, and his first appearance at a Phillies game was April 25th, 1978. Next Opening Day will mark 38 consecutive years. If that isn’t Mount Rushmore worthy, I don’t know what else is………especially since the Phillies haven’t had a real run of truly great players over the 125+ years of existence (which is pretty sad when you think of it).
Millwood’s no no was on The Phanatics b day. It was 4/28. I think “his” actual day is 5/2
I felt like spreading the love out chronologically. I went with Pete Alexander, Robin Roberts, Mike Schmidt, and Chase Utley. To me, the issue isn’t that the Phils haven’t had great players – it’s that their great players have been too close together in terms of value and/or impact. That makes this tough. Fun, though! The only real ‘gimme’ I see is Schmidt. As for the rest? I don’t think you can really go wrong, at least if you’re voting within reason.
I voted for Schmidt, Carlton, Roberts and Ashburn. I think that the first three clearly deserve to be on the monument. I chose Ashburn over Utley (my all-time favorite Phil)for a couple of reasons. Ashburn is a true legend in the Philadelphia. After his playing career he was an announcer for three decades. Ashburn and Harry Kalas were the voices of the Phillies during that 1970s and 80s run. Utley, while great, was never the acknowledged leader of the team. He was unfairly overshadowed by Ryan Howard’s slugging, Jimmy Rollins all around game and the pitching of Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay during his prime.
First I narrowed the list down to 8. Klein and Allen were the first 2 overboard and then Utley. The last guy to get tossed was Ashburn, which was really a hard call. My final votes:
Schmidt- well duh.
Lefty- it actually came down to him & Ashburn and the WS titles was the deciding factor.
Roberts- maybe not quite as great as Carlton at his best but you had a much better idea of what you were going to get from year to year.
Alexander- OK I know he was only a Philly for 8 years and one of those was as a washed up 43 year old. But he was as good as any pitcher has ever been for those first 7 years and he’s not going in (or up as the case may be) as a Cub so do we just leave him off of Mount Rushmore altogether then?
Seven years. 60.8 WAR. It’s not his fault the guys he was playing with weren’t good enough to win it all because he sure was.
I just don’t see how you can leave him off.
Schmidt and Carlton without a doubt Roberts and Ashburn – sorry Chase war or not Richie gets the nod
Schmidt, Ashburn, Roberts, Carlton. Mount Rushmore is about fame, so even if Utley has more WAR than Ashburn, Ashburn was the face of the Phillies during the the 50s.
I took Schmidt, Carlton, Roberts, and Rollins.
Hard to leave out Ashburn, but I wanted a player from their recent run of success. Utley has been more productive than Rollins, of course, but Rollins has had the longer and more durable career, and is now at or near the top of the franchise leaderboard for most major offensive counting stats; so to me he’s more the ‘face’ of the franchise than Utley.
Is there an easier choice than Schmidt in the Philiies Mount Rushmore, than any other team?
Now that Mount Rushmore is back, we need to get back too the simi-fantasy-baseball thing that we were part of, a few months ago.
My guy was great… except for the fact he couldn’t pitch more than 15 innings A YEAR. I did think that was cool though. Probably a lot of work to put together.
Adam has said he is too busy to continue with that. I was considering prodding him to see if he still has the save files so someone else might carry on with it…
Tony Gwynn was easier. You could envision Joe Baseball Fan saying Carlton or maybe a modern guy like Rollins/Utley if asked to name the best Phillie. Schmidt is pretty obviously the best but it’s possible someone else could pop into your mind if put on the spot. I can’t imagine anyone not saying Tony Gwynn; there simply isn’t another option.
Based on teams we’ve already voted for, George Brett and the Royals is the same way to me. But yeah, Schmidt is a complete no-brainer.
As a side note – is there a way to disable the voting on those old polls? It looks like you could go back and keep voting. I didn’t, of course, just seems odd.
Andy would have to disable the old polls.
This one is programmed to close on Nov 18th at 23:59 Pacific.
Babe Ruth……….Hank Aaron…………Willie Mays………possibly Ernie Banks……..
Banks has the advantage of not playing for another team at the end of his career.
I went with Schmidt, Carlton, Roberts and Ashburn. Alexander is the last player I cut.
Thank you, Doug, for bringing this back. It bugged me that this series was dropped in the middle for no reason. I didn’t get involved in CoG voting right away because I feared that it might also just fade away.
Wow… I was just imagining what would happen if the COG stopped for no apparent reason. There would be mutiny! People would seek out birtelcom’s house and… I don’t know… forcibly tie him to a chair until he ran the next round, or something.
Oh no, not the Comfy Chair!
“No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!”
As an FYI, there seems to be a discrepancy re: Chase Utley’s WAR. His player page lists 62.7, not the 61.5 that comes up in search results.
I think the 62.7 is correct, that’s what you get when you add up him individual seasons.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/WAR_active.shtml
Probably doesn’t effect anyone’s vote, but worth noting.
I’ve also noticed occasional differences in what comes up on a search and what the player page says. Perhaps one total comes from adding rounded numbers together, whilst the other total uses the raw, non-rounded numbers.
RJ – It definitely seems to happen more than it should. But I can’t see how it would be due to rounding. A 1.2 WAR difference is quite large. And just looking at Schmidt, his player page shows the exact same WAR as the search results.
Looks like the Utley error has already been corrected. His player page now lists 61.5 career WAR, the lower of the two figures. When I looked at it earlier his 2014 was listed at 4.8. It’s now been changed to 3.6. That must have been the source of the discrepancy.
Schmidt, Roberts, Carlton….Allen
For combined seasons, from the age of 22-25, Dick Allen is third (3rd !) all-time in oWAR – behind two bums named Cobb and Mantle. Then he ripped his ulna nerve in his wrist and hand in August 1967…
I can only imagine what he would have done in the Utley-Rollins-Howard era playing in that newer little league park with the 365 foot alleys. But, if you go to BR and enter the 2009 season for Allen, you get something like:
.327 .407 .585 in lieu of .311 .388 .585 for his first four seasons (22-25)
sorry, that actual slugging percentage was “only” .559 in the second example
Schmidt, Carlton and Roberts look home and dry for the top 3 spots.
Quite a race, though, for the final Rushmore face, with Utley and Ashburn neck-and-neck and Pete Alexander not too far behind.
Delahanty, Rollins, Allen and Klein round out the top 10.
May I ask, who are the 3 “write-ins” who have received votes? I’m curious. I’m assuming the Phillie Phanatic got at least one… but what about the others?
Two votes for the Phillie Phanatic, and one for John Kruk.
HA! That’s clever.
John Kruk: Phattest Phillie?
Famously, of course, got a hit in his final PA to push his career batting average to .300.
He also nearly won OBP titles in 1992 and 1993… some fella named Bonds was really good at getting on-base, though. Kruk did nearly take the batting title from Sheffield in 1992 (Sheff won it .330 to .323. Kruk was also the NL Player of the Week three times. Most impressive was the third of those, the first week of 1993. Kruk hit .476/.577/1.000, going 10/21 with 5 BB, 5 2B, and 2 HR. None of that would indicate Mount Rushmore to me, but hey… not a bad career.
Greg Luzinski may have been even more rotund, Doom. I would take The Bull in a fight between the two.
B-Ref lists Krukkie at 170 lbs. Uh-huh.
http://mlb.mlb.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=117339#gameType=%27R%27 lists Kruk at 204 lbs. The search results page there also lists him as a DH, which is interesting for someone who played 1155 of his 1200 career games in the National League (before inter-league play).
Took a peek at Pete Rose.
Noticed that he played all 162 games at age 41 with a WAR of -1.1
Worst WAR for 162 games played:
-1.8 … Joe Carter
-1.1 … P.E. Rose
-1.1 … Neifi Perez
-1.1 … Matt Kemp
-0.7 … Bobby Richardson
-0.6 … Leon Wagner (163)
-0.4 … P.E. Rose
________
Most games in a season, age 40+
162 … Rose
156 … Wagner
156 … Winfield
152 … Murray
151 … Rose
150 … Wagner
150 … Darrell Evans
Pete also played 162 at age 39.
________
And no, I’ve decided not to vote for Rose on the Philly Mt. Rushmore
For the pre-expansion crowd, here are the worst WAR for 154+ games played.
-3.0 … Tommy Thevenow (1930)
-1.7 … Tony Lupien (1948)
-1.6 … Sam Dente (1950)
-1.1 … Harry Swacina, 1914 (FL)
-0.9 … Doc Cramer (1941), Bob Kennedy (1940), Ski Melillo (1932), Frank O’Rourke (1929)
-0.8 … Eddie Robinson (1953)
-0.6 … Leo Norris (1936)
Thevenow and Norris were Phillies. The rest (except Swacina) are AL teams (Browns, As, White Sox, Sens). Dente also had -1.4 WAR in 153 games in 1949.
These are the career leaders (excl. pitchers) for players with 200 games played and a WAR rate lower than -1.5 per 100 games (among pitchers, the most career games for those meeting the WAR rate criterion is 257 games by Alex Ferguson).
Generated 11/6/2014.
Note number 6 on the list above.
Sam Dente’s nickname was “Blackie”, which totally wouldn’t go over nowadays. I wonder why they didn’t call him Al.
Probably because he liked Spaghetti Westerns
Gavvy Cravath didn’t make the bigs to stay until age 31, then put up some numbers that make you wonder what he might have done if he’s gotten an earlier start. He set a Minor League record for HRs in 1911 (29) and escaped the contract that held him in Minneapolis by accident. Four years later he was the offensive force that drove the Phillies to the pennant. Arguably he was just as important as Alexander. Without either one the team would have gone nowhere.
Not a Rushmore guy, no, but for 8 years, starting at age 31, he was very good.
Cravath is best known as the guy who held the career home run record until some guy named Babe Ruth came along. (Baseball Reference lists Roger Connor but he played entirely in the 19th century).
Anyway, Cravath is one of those guys who could have been a HOFer if he had been born on the east coast. Unfortunately he was born in California and spent a while toiling in the PCL before making his way east.
Of Cravath’s 119 HR, 92 came at the Baker Bowl. He had 10 bounce HR and 4 IPHR. He was a RHB so if he took advantage of the short RF fence at the Bowl he was going the opposite way.
Just to note, although probably no one knew it at the time, Cravath was in fact never higher than 4th all-time in home runs, behind three 19th century players: Connor, Sam Thompson, and Harry Stovey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lifetime_home_run_leaders_in_Major_League_Baseball
David H – I’m never really sure where the early baseball records fit in. Nevertheless, I’m guessing the Cravath had the record for most over the fence home runs since the other players on the list were likely IPHR types.
According to their HR logs on bb-ref, the totals of the top pre-Ruth HR hitters break down as follows:
Connor 138 total: 1 bounce, 17 IPHR = 120 over the fence
Thompson 126 total: 13 IPHR = 113 OTF
Cravath 119 total: 10 bounce, 4 IPHR = 105 OTF
J Ryan 118 total: 2 bounce, 17 IPHR = 99 OTF
Stovey 122 total: 1 bounce, 27 IPHR = 94 OTF
So Connor, Thompson, and Cravath were the only 3 players with 100+ over the fence home runs before Ruth.
Priceless quote from Cravath’s SABR bio. In reference to his lack of speed:
“They call me wooden shoes and piano legs and a few other pet names,” he once said. “I do not claim to be the fastest man in the world, but I can get around the bases with a fair wind and all sails set. And so long as I am busting the old apple on the seam, I am not worrying a great deal about my legs.”
Busting the ol’ apple. On the seam. We just need more people in the world who talk to way, see.
Schmidt, Utley, Carlton, Roberts.
Schmidt, Rollins, Bunning, and Hamels. And in my defense: we’re talking players who best exemplify being a Phillie, not players who were all-time awesome. 🙂
3 pitchers for me too. Couldn’t pull the trigger for Utley over Alexander.
Phillies might have the easiest Mt. Rushmore to choose in baseball. Just walk around Citizens Bank Park, find the four statues, there you go.
I voted for Schmidt, Carlton, Roberts, and Alexander. Alexander just edged out Ashburn for my last spot
I’m glad to see the Mt. Rushmore series back and would also like to see the “Does He Belong in the Hall of Fame” polls brought back, especially with the Golden Era Veteran Committee election coming up in December. I’d love to see what the readers here think of Miñoso, Kaat, Boyer, Hodges, Tiant and others HOF candidacies. Also, there a lot of recently retired players such as Abreu, Rolen, and Helton who would make interesting subjects
I just noticed Ashburn’s 1958 season. I would bet that may be the only time where a player had 215 hits, 97 walks, 30 stolen bases, and scored under 100 runs. I don’t know for sure, I don’t have a subscription to play index right now.
Can someone check that?
But jeez, what an offensive mess that team must have been in–the guy was on base over 315 times and his teammates could not bring him home more than 98 times?
Joseph – You actually don’t need a subscription to check this. And yes, you’re right. Only season with 200+ hits, 90+ walks, 30+ steals and fewer than 100 runs scored. If you eliminate the SB requirement, you add Pete Rose in 1979 and nearly Wade Boggs in 1983 (exactly 100 runs scored).
Also— Robin Roberts had his last big year for that team, going 17-14. Ashburn’s WAR was 7.1, Roberts’ was 6.2. The team finished 69-85 in last place even though they won their last 6 games. Prior to that they had a streak of 11-32. A weird season, one probably worth analyzing for historical purposes, if anyone does that sort of thing.
Yeah, offensively they didn’t look that bad. They were a little below the league average in runs scored and 6th out of 8 teams in scoring but also just 2 runs from moving up another notch. And in terms of team OPS+ they were 4th in the league. Seven of their 8 starters and 5 of the 7 guys on the bench with more than 100 PA’s all have OPS+’s above 100.
The only place they really stunk up the joint was LOB, where they were almost 100 over the league average and 69 more than the next team.
It’s also a little surprising they didn’t follow up their 1950 World Series appearance with more success than they did. Only once did they manage to finish within 10 games of first (9.5 back but in 4th place) and only once as high as third place (but 22 games back). I know the Dodgers were a better team and all but by that much?
And they had a pretty good core of players together for the entire first half or better of the decade: Stan Lopata at catcher, Granny Hamner at short, Willie Jones at 3rd, Ashburn and Del Ennis in the outfield and Roberts was joined by Curt Simmons and Bob Jones as starters.
There are certainly teams that had less to work with than that and accomplished more.
Adding to Hartving:
1) The Phillies were 1st in hits, 2nd in double, 3rd in triples, 1st in walks, 1st in OBP, yet they finished 6th in runs scored. Sure they were 6th in home runs and slugging but that doesn’t seem like it should be enough to cancel out all the positive.
2) 15 players had 100+ PAs and 12 of those posted an OPS+ of 102 or better. But the other 3 had an OPS+ under 71. And those 3 accounted for over 1000 PAs. Which is how the Phillies ended up with a team OPS+ of 96.
3) They used 19 pitchers but only 6 posted an ERA+ above 100 and two of those pitched under 10 innings combined.
4) Ashburn is the only player with a positive Rfield. The 14 other position players with 100+ PAs all posted negative Rfields. Team Rfield is -60.
5) Rey Shemproch did a decent job as the #2 in the rotation behind Roberts. But he could NOT hit. A -14 Rbat in only 77 PAs (-43 OPS+).
It’s a tangent, yeah, but the season’s over—long time till spring:
The 1958 season itself was pretty weird. In the NL, the Braves led by 1 game on July 9 with a record of 40-34 and the Phillies were only 3 out at 37-37. At the end the Braves were 92-62, and the Phiillies were bunched at the bottom with three other teams, 2 at 72-82, 1 at 71-83, and the Phils at 69-85.
In the AL the Yankees on July 10 were 50-26, leading by 11, and at one point had extended their dominance to 63-30, a pace to win 105 games. Instead they went into the tank, finishing 29-32 and ending up with the same 92-62 W-L record as the Braves. The bunching here came between 3rd and 7th place with only a 6 game spread among the teams.
In the WS the hot team from Milwaukee took a 3-1 lead, but the cold Yanks caught fire and came back with 3 in a row to win, the last two in County Stadium where they had lost their previous 4 over two series. Two of the games went into extra innings.
Ugh. I have been raised to have a visceral reaction whenever the ’58 series or the ’59 playoff is brought up. My stomach is seriously queasy just thinking about that. Yuck.
Schmidt, Carlton and Roberts continue to lead the way, with Richie Ashburn now installed in the fourth and final position, a handful of votes ahead of Chase Utley.
Starting on Wednesday, you can vote again, if it’s been a week since you first cast your ballot. So, go ahead and confirm your original selections or, perhaps, make a change.
Schmidt
Delahanty
Alexander
Utley
_____________
I voted for Big Ed, even though he “Jumped from the Philadelphia Phillies to the Cleveland Infants.”
And Roberts & Carlton may have done it longer, but Grover’s 7 years were ridiculous. Deadball era or not, a 4-year stretch of
121-50
1.74
.
.
.
gets my vote.
Polls close in 6 hours or so. Richie Ashburn is currently leading Chase Utley by 5 votes for the fourth and final face of the Phillies’ Mount Rushmore.
Good to see this back after a couple of years, roughly the equivalent of me being out of the country!
Missed this vote. Can’t disagree with the final vote, although somehow I wanted to vote for Old Pete. He deserves to be on some team’s Mt. Rushmore, yet he only spent seven years in Philly. Ed Delahanty? Time and a suicide have dimmed the image of one of the best hitters (the best?) in Philly history. Or was it murder?
I missed the poll, but I would have voted for the top four vote getters: Schmidt, Carlton, Roberts, Ashburn. Hard to argue with any of them.