Decade Dominance – 10 Year Batting Leaders Since 1901

On ESPN’s Sunday night game this week, I learned that Robinson Cano is the leader in games played over the past ten seasons (2007-16). Indeed, he was the leader as of that date (July 31), but just two games ahead of Adrian Gonzalez, the 10 year leader ending in 2015.

That, of course, made me wonder about other decades and other statistical leaders. If you were wondering too, wonder no more, as those leaders are after the jump.

I’ve presented a variety of offensive statistics and shown the major league leader in each for every ten year period starting in 1910 (thus, the first decade leaders would be for the 1901 to 1910 seasons inclusive). For all statistics, I’ve used Baseball-Reference.com as my source so their versions of OPS+ and WAR are represented here.

For rate stats, I’ve set a relatively low qualifying mark of 4000 PA to give a break to players losing time to injuries or military service, since those circumstances would generally exclude players from leading in counting stats (only a few players have led in counting stats in decades with significant lost playing time, or that began before or ended after their careers). The low qualifying mark for rate stats does see some players leading in decades that began before or ended after their careers (in a couple of instances, a player led in a decade that ended after his death).

So, here we go, decade by decade. To find a specific player, enter his name in the Search box.

Decades ending from 1910 to 1919

This decade starts with Honus Wagner as the dominant player but that quickly changes to Ty Cobb as the period progresses. The surprise is Sam Crawford, known primarily as the all-time triples leader, but also a frequent leader in several other categories.

[table id=297 /]

Decades ending from 1920 to 1929

Cobb is joined by Tris Speaker as players dominating in the first half of this period, but they give way to Babe Ruth and Rogers Hornsby in the second half. Max Carey takes over from Cobb as the leading base stealer.

[table id=298 /]

Decades ending from 1930 to 1939

Ruth and Hornsby continue to dominate in the first half of this period, but give way to Lou Gehrig and Paul Waner over the second half. Jimmie Foxx‘s tenure as a decade leader starts at the end of this period and continues into the beginning of the next.

[table id=299/]

Decades ending from 1940 to 1949

Foxx, Mel Ott and two Joes (Medwick and DiMaggio) dominate this period with Ted Williams starting his appearances at the end of these decades. Surprise is Doc Cramer, a frequent leader in games, hits and singles.

[table id=300 /]

Decades ending from 1950 to 1959

Stan is the Man of this period, leading frequently in almost every category, including taking the doubles and XBH crowns in all 10 decades. The Splinter became eligible to lead in rate stats at the end of the previous period but falls below the 4000 PA qualifier when he serves in Korea, allowing Musial to claim the rate stat crowns for a couple of years before Williams again becomes eligible.

[table id=301 /]

Decades ending from 1960 to 1969

Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle and Hank Aaron are all over this period with Roberto Clemente and Harmon Killebrew making appearances at the end of the period.

[table id=302 /]

Decades ending from 1970 to 1979

Killebrew and Aaron continue to lead at the beginning of this period before giving way to Rod Carew, two Willies (McCovey and Stargell) and the Big Red Machine (Pete Rose, Joe Morgan, Johnny Bench and Tony Perez). Yaz and Reggie also show up while Lou Brock dominates in base stealing and triples.

[table id=303 /]

Decades ending from 1980 to 1989

Rose, Morgan, Carew and Stargell continue as leaders starting this period, before giving way to Mike Schmidt, Jim Rice, Rickey Henderson and a pair of Royals (George Brett and Willie Wilson).

[table id=304 /]

Decades ending from 1990 to 1999

Henderson continues his dominance throughout this period and is joined by Wade Boggs, Eddie Murray, Tony Gwynn and Kirby Puckett. Frank Thomas and Barry Bonds start to appear at the end of the period while the sabermetrically-challenged Joe Carter turns in a very creditable showing leading frequently in the marquis categories of Home Runs and RBI (and extra-base hits).

[table id=305 /]

Decades ending from 2000 to 2009

Bonds continues to dominate throughout this period and is joined by Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez. Albert Pujols starts to appear at the end of the period, even before his career reaches 10 seasons.

[table id=306 /]

Decades ending from 2010 to 2016

Pujols continues to dominate in this period and is joined by Ichiro and Miggy. For the decade that will end with the current season, I’ve shown the current leader (as of July 31) and any others who might conceivably catch that leader.

[table id=307 /]

Superlatives

Here are the high and low results for each of the metrics.

[table id=308 /]

Decade Leadership by Player

Here are the totals by player, for times as decade leader in each statistic. You can scroll through the list, search for players or click on a column to sort by that metric. Owing to limitations of the Table tool, I’ve had to separate these totals into multiple tables.

[table id=314 /]

[table id=313 /]

[table id=309 /]

.

Combining the tables, here are the top 25 in overall decade leaders. Interesting that the all-time home run leader was a decade leader in that category just once.

[table id=315 /]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Luis Gomez
Luis Gomez
7 years ago

As always, Doug, what a wonderful job. Thanks for a very entertaining piece of reading.
In the end, it makes total sense that the universally acknowledged greatest player of all time, leads the way in total decade leaderships.
I’ll look forward to your pitcher’s version.;-)

bstar
7 years ago

This is, like, the most Doug thing ever.

Great stuff, sir.

no statistician but
no statistician but
7 years ago

Seeing Sam Crawford’s prominence in these lists makes me wonder why he wasn’t voted into the Circle of Greats more quickly. At least he got in.

bstar
7 years ago

He was voted in fairly quickly. Crawford debuted in 1880, finishing second to also-debuting Christy Mathewson. Shoeless Joe won the 1878-79 election, and Crawford made it in on his third try, the 1876-77 ballot.

http://www.highheatstats.com/2015/10/circle-of-greats-1876-77-balloting/#comment-107108

no statistician but
no statistician but
7 years ago
Reply to  bstar

I was a lot younger back then (early 2016) and time seemed to go slower.

Seriously—I’ve been reading through some of those threads, and I’m amazed at the cogency of the arguments for and against various players, as well as the absence of mean-spiritedness and rancor displayed among those who differed in opinion. Compared to following the current political disputation, it was like diving into a swimming pool on a hot summer day—of which we’ve already had too many this year, by the way, actual and metaphorical.

Brett Alan
Brett Alan
7 years ago

Thanks for doing this. Bookmarked it, and will definitely be poring over it for some time to come.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
7 years ago

Nice going Doug, you always seem to come up with stats seen nowhere else. There have been 107 rolling 10-years periods since 1901 so I guess you did them 1 at a time.
The WWII years allowed for some lesser names as leaders, such as Rudy York, Harlond Clift, Stan Hack, Frank McCormick, Wally Moses, Charlie Keller, Jeff Heath and Bob Elliott.

I liked Stan Musial’s clean sweep of XBH during the 1950-1959 decade.

David P
David P
7 years ago

So basically we’re at low Peak WAR. Whoever ends up leading the 2007-2016 period in WAR will have the lowest total ever, with the exception of the WWII effected periods of 36-45, 37-46, and 38-47. In fact, the 07-16 period will be the first non-war effected period under 62 WAR. And the period coming up (08-17) is guaranteed to also have a leader under that 62 WAR. The period after that (09-18) will depend on Mike Trout staying healthy and great.

So I wonder why Peak War is at such a low, low point???

bstar
7 years ago
Reply to  David P

Albert Pujols’ decline is playing a big part here. He’s only got 14 WAR since joining the Angels. If he could sustained his greatness a little longer (sort of like the way Miguel Cabrera appears to be doing) he’d be putting up 10-year WAR scores at least in the 60s.

MIggy can get up to around 60 WAR for 2009-2018 if he keeps up a 5-WAR per year pace. His two worst years as a regular (2007 and 2008, 6 WAR combined) will be off the books by then.

And Mr. Trout will be crashing the party soon enough.

Doug
Doug
7 years ago
Reply to  bstar

Pujols ranked 9th in career WAR through age 31 (his time with the Cardinals). That will drop to 15th or 16th through age 36. Pujols’ 14 WAR age 32-36 ranks 18th Of 20 players since 1901 with 75 WAR through age 31, ahead of only Griffey and Foxx. His best season (2012) in that period unfortunately ranks with Alfonso Soriano and Juan Gonzalez as the only three (of 22) 50 double/30 HR seasons under 6 WAR (that said, Pujols is the only player with three such seasons, and the other two both exceeded 8 WAR). Heads up that Pujols is… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
7 years ago
Reply to  Doug

Earlier in his career, there were persistent rumors that Pujols was older than in “official” age. How would his decline phase look when plotted against similar players, but, say, 2 or 3 years older?

Doug
Doug
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike L

There are 25 players with 75 WAR thru age 33 (actually 24 + Yaz at 74.9, who I added to the group). Pujols’ 14 WAR since 2012 is much closer to the midpoint of the group for WAR aged 34-38. Cal Ripken was at 14 WAR and ranked 15th of the 25, but Joe Morgan at the midpoint in 13th spot was just a tick higher at 15 WAR.

Hartvig
Hartvig
7 years ago

Great stuff that I will have to find time to pour over at length today or tomorrow. For now a couple of things jumped out at me. The first was that while it isn’t surprising that your might find some less celebrated names in categories like games played or stolen bases or triples I have to admit that seeing Bobby Veach as the RBI leader for 4 seasons in the hitting crazy, all-time-great studded 1920’s was something of a shocker (and yes I realize that the majority of those seasons were actually in the 1920’s but still…). The other name… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
7 years ago

Great stuff, Doug. Wanted to throw something out to the acute observers of HHS. Comparing just 10 year WAR (and OPS+) of more modern greats as opposed to those in the past (and excluding the 1940’s decade because of time lost to WWII) there is a very noticeable difference in the values put up. Would people say, since these are comparative numbers, that the modern player competes against a generally more athletic field, and so it’s harder to separate as much as a supremely talented player of the past did?

Hartvig
Hartvig
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike L

I’m sure that’s a big part of it. Also both Bill James and evolutionary biologist both have written on how when an organism- for lack of a better term- becomes more established and mature, you tend to see fewer outliers from the norm. One of the examples that Gould used was the Burgess shale, a very early moment in life’s development. James used the various levels of organized baseball- from T-ball to the majors- and how as you progressed up the ladder you see fewer 20 to 0 blowouts and players who are so much better than their peers, like… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
7 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

Hartvig, if you read Gould, do you also read McPhee?

Hartvig
Hartvig
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike L

I have his Annals Of The Former World but I’m embarrassed to admit that I’ve never gotten around to reading it. I’ve got 18 different bookshelves in my house, crammed to overflowing with books that I bought before I retired that I promised myself I would get around to reading someday. In the past 5 years I’ve made a pretty good start on it but I’d guess there are still several hundred still to go. I just started on a paperback copy of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich- all 1600+ pages of it- about a week ago… Read more »

Jonas Gumby
Jonas Gumby
7 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

The edition with the Swastika located prominently on the spine? My wife made me sell that one as she insisted it frightened visitors.

Kahuna Tuna
Kahuna Tuna
7 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

I just finished Shirer’s Collapse of the Third Republic. Talk about your low-WAR politicians and generals.

Hartvig
Hartvig
7 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

On my copy the swastika is located on the front cover.

And my original comment should read 18 different bookcases and not shelves.

I need to do some downsizing.

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
7 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

I just bought Annals of the Former World last month.
It is currently 9th in queue.

no statistician but
no statistician but
7 years ago

One player in these lists, Ichiro Suzuki, just tripled for his 3000th hit in a big league career that began at the ripe age of 27. Suzuki, like Nolan Ryan, is not the greatest at his position, but he is unique, and his uniqueness, like Ryan’s, ought to be celebrated.

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
7 years ago

I dunno, it looked like he coulda stretched that to 4 bags.
Woulda liked to see the play at the plate, regardless of the outcome.

no statistician but
no statistician but
7 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

Here’s a question for anyone who has a clue (I don’t):

To me the most obviously comparable player historically to Ichiro Suzuki is Sam Rice. Both got late starts, both chalked up around 3000 hits, both were right fielders, both led the league in hits and SBs, neither hit for great power, etc., etc.. Similarities abound, and differences—Suzuki strikes out far more—are often era specific.

So why, at B-Ref, under Similarity Scores, don’t they come up as even remotely similar?

Just asking.

Hartvig
Hartvig
7 years ago

I thought maybe there was a timeline adjustment of some sort since for the vast majority of players their closest comps played in the same era but since Doc Cramer is Ichiro’s closest comp I’m guessing that isn’t the case, at least here.

Could it be that in the Similar Batter rankings they don’t consider a players age?

bstar
7 years ago

nsb, just because Rice doesn’t show up as one of the 10 most similar players doesn’t mean he isn’t “remotely similar”. He could be 11th for all we know. Rice shows up all over Ichiro’s age comps (the column on the right). He’s 3rd most similar through age 41, 4th through age 40, 5th through age 39, 6th through 38, and so on and so forth. Same deal on Rice’s player page. Ichiro isn’t in Rice’s career top 10 but he’s all over the late-age comps. But that ends after Rice’s age-42 season. Ichiro doesn’t show up anymore in the… Read more »

David P
David P
7 years ago
Reply to  bstar

In addition to what others have pointed out, BR’s similarity scores don’t distinguish between outfield positions (unlike James’ original formulation). Which is how Ichiro ends up with a CFer (Cramer) and a LFer (Clarke) as his top two comps through age 41. If that information was incorporated, then there’s a very good chance that Rice would be Ichiro’s top comp through age 41.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/similarity.shtml

Doug
Doug
7 years ago

Ichiro, at age 42 years 290 days, just edges out Rickey Henderson for the oldest player to record his 3000th hit. Rickey was 42 years, 286 days when he collected his 3000th hit on Oct 7, 2001.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
7 years ago
Reply to  Doug

So perhaps his recent 7 game hitless streak was not an accident. 🙂

Jimbo
Jimbo
7 years ago

I’d be very interested in seeing this done for IP. It would highlight the continual decline in innings that pitchers throw.

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
7 years ago

I haven’t stopped in for awhile – it seems I have a hard time paying simultaneous attention to baseball stats and polling numbers – but just looked in and saw this wonderful post. Bstar’s comment at #2 is perfect, and a good reminder to me about why I keep coming back to HHS.

Thanks again, Doug.

Mike L
Mike L
7 years ago

EPM, I’m having the same problem. I come here for sanity.

CursedClevelander
CursedClevelander
7 years ago

So I know I haven’t posted in a while, but yes, this is amazing. I can source so much trivia from this post. This is indeed the ‘most Doug’ thing ever, and it is glorious.

Carnack
Carnack
7 years ago

I thought it was interesting that Clemente continued to lead in BA for two years after he died.

oneblankspace
oneblankspace
7 years ago
Reply to  Carnack

Nobody could get him out to lower his average.

Don Rockwell
2 years ago

Why would you include Pete Rose in the 1970s but not Brooks Robinson in the 1960s?